8TEN Multi-Building Utility Consumption and Resource Management

by WNE

Review multi-building utility consumption through 8TEN maps, trends and reports.

8TEN Multi-Building Utility Consumption and Resource Management
Headquarters
Singapore
Connectivity
LoRaWAN, 4G
Deployment
Public SaaS
Services
Installation, System Integration, Support & Maintenance

How it works

Sense
PIKA interfaces, supported smart meters and third-party ingestion paths collect timestamped electricity, water and gas readings across mixed meter brands and protocols.
Connect
PIKA sends meter data through LoRaWAN or 4G LTE into the cloud-based 8TEN platform; integrations can also ingest supported meter sources.
Analyze
8TEN normalizes readings, maps usage from portfolio to property and room level, compares trends, flags unusual consumption and produces operational and predictive.
Act
Facility teams investigate waste, correct leaks or excessive loads, prioritize efficiency work, allocate costs.

About 8TEN Multi-Building Utility Consumption and Resource Management

WNE 8TEN centralizes electricity, water and gas meter data across properties. Maps, consumption trends and reports support resource review across a building portfolio.

Does it fit your project?

Best suited to

  • Multi-building operators
  • Facility resource-management teams

You need

  • Compatible meter-data sources
  • Property mapping and configured reporting

Limitations

  • The platform uses meter data rather than replacing every meter
  • Data quality and site coverage affect comparisons

Cost estimate

1 site, 10 assets, United States
$2,000 – $6,400
$200 – $800
Estimated first year, by component
$800 – $2,500$1,000 – $3,100$200 – $800
Hardware$800 – $2,500

Sensors, gateways and spare units

Installation and setup$1,000 – $3,100

Site survey, mounting, commissioning and configuration

Software and services, 12 months$200 – $800

Platform subscription, connectivity, data and support

This is an estimate by IoT Apps based on comparable deployments, not a quote from WNE.
Get an estimate for your own project and invite WNE to confirm a price and lead time, on this page.

Similar solutions

See all solutions
iNELS Commercial Building Management and Energy Automation
iNELS Commercial Building Management and Energy Automationby ELKO EP

Local building software visualizes events and energy flows.

Optergy Integrated Building HVAC Lighting and Equipment Control
Optergy Integrated Building HVAC Lighting and Equipment Controlby Optergy

The BMS creates contextual displays, applies schedules, optimum-start, setpoint, demand.

Smart Resort
Smart Resortby SF SYSTEM

LoRaWAN SOS buttons and multi-mode trackers cover guests and rental gear at ski and water-sports resorts, speeding…

Questions and answers

Q: Is it limited to electricity?

A: No. Water and gas are also supported.

Q: Can consumption be viewed geographically?

A: The source describes a map-based property view.

Q: Is this separate from the 8TEN billing platform?

A: It is a portfolio-management application of the same 8TEN MDMS.

What does a deployment cost?

For 1 site with 10 monitored assets in United States, IoT Apps estimates $2,000 – $6,400 in the first year and $200 – $800 every year after. This is an estimate based on comparable deployments, not a quote from WNE.

VendorWNE, Singapore
IndustryBuildings & Facilities, Environment & Conservation, Commercial, Other
Use casesEnergy Metering, Water Metering, Gas Metering, Process Optimization, Resource Metering
ConnectivityLoRaWAN, 4G
DeploymentPublic SaaS
ServicesInstallation, System Integration, Support & Maintenance, Data Analytics, Software Platform
Available inWorldwide

Have a question for WNE?

IoT Apps Enterprise

Not sure this fits your deployment?

Ask the AI Solution Architect: compare this solution against alternatives, check connectivity for your region and get integration guidance. Included with IoT Apps Enterprise.

Ask the Architect
IoT Apps is an independent platform. Listings do not imply endorsement by or partnership with the vendor. Estimates are indicative and based on comparable deployments, not on vendor quotes.